Posted in Theology

Download Against atheism: why Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris are by Ian S. Markham PDF

By Ian S. Markham

During this new ebook, Ian Markham analyzes the atheistic global view, opposing the arguments given through well known authors of books on atheism, comparable to Richard Dawkins. not like different responses to the recent atheism, Markham demanding situations those authors on their lonesome floor by means of wondering their realizing of trust and of atheism itself. the result's a remodeling creation to Christianity that might entice an individual drawn to this debate.

• a desirable problem to the new spate of profitable books written by way of high-profile atheist authors corresponding to Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, and Sam Harris
• Tackles those authors on their lonesome floor, arguing that they don't comprehend the character of atheism, not to mention theology and ethics
• attracts on principles from Nietzsche, cosmology, and paintings to build a robust reaction that enables for a religion that's grounded, but person who acknowledges the truth of uncertainty
• Succinct, enticing, yet robustly argued, this new ebook by means of a number one educational and author includes a wealth of profound insights that express non secular trust in a brand new gentle

Show description

Read or Download Against atheism: why Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris are fundamentally wrong PDF

Similar theology books

Beyond Theism and Atheism: Heidegger's Significance for Religious Thinking (Studies in Philosophy and Religion)

My first 12 months in graduate college marked by way of preliminary expo­ bound to Heidegger and a few of his vital early essays. at the moment, disillusioned with the kingdom within which "religious thought" lay, i used to be quick struck by way of the capability Heidegger offered for breaking new flooring in a box that had seeming­ ly exhausted itself by way of transforming the standard concerns and solutions.

More than Matter?: What Humans Really Are

Keith Ward has taught philosophy and theology in British universities for the prior 40 years, and he's now weighting in on an enormous highbrow conflict: whther human individuals are basically fabric - not anything yet topic - or whther there's one other, deeply worthwhile a part of us, which transcends bodies in nature and ethical worthy.

Understanding the "Imago Dei"

As theologians throughout confessional divides try and say whatever major approximately human dignity in our modern society, there's clean curiosity within the old Christian doctrine that the person is created within the 'imago Dei'. Theology is grounding accountability for others and for the area round us during this universal imaginative and prescient that the human being's limitless horizon lies in a divine calling and future.

Christo-Fiction: The Ruins of Athens and Jerusalem

François Laruelle's lifelong venture of "nonphilosophy," or "nonstandard philosophy," thinks earlier the theoretical limits of Western philosophy to achieve new kin among faith, technology, politics, and artwork. In Christo-Fiction Laruelle pursuits the inflexible, self-sustaining arguments of metaphysics, rooted in Judaic and Greek concept, and the novel strength of Christ, whose "crossing" disrupts their round discourse.

Additional info for Against atheism: why Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris are fundamentally wrong

Sample text

If God is timeless, then God has quite literally no time in which to act. It looks incoherent. ” How can we affirm both of these assertions simultaneously? One major question for believers is this: what exactly do we mean by God? Are we claiming that God is some sort of energy that is present in the universe? Are we claiming that God is something separate from the universe and if so what? Does God have space or live in time or not? If persons of faith cannot explain what they are affirming to exist, then atheism has won.

W. ; Friedrich Nietzsche, Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, translated as The Joyful Wisdom, Thomas Common, 1910, later translated as The Gay Science. Introduction Meeting Fred and Natalie To begin this exploration of atheism, let us start with an imaginative exercise, where we attempt to get inside the mind of Fred. Fred is an energetic atheist, completely persuaded by the writings of Dawkins et al. We will then explore the worldview of Natalie, an intelligent, thoughtful believer. The Perspective from Fred Fred has never really believed in God.

But, courtesy of Newtonian physics and modern science, this picture of the universe has been displaced with a meteorological explanation. And, of course, everyone accepts the scientific explanation for weather. God has been displaced as an explanation. For a time, God was moved one stage back. God became the designer of the universe. However, with natural selection, God has been eliminated from this role. Hitchens is very critical of those who suggest that evolution is God’s mechanism for creating the world.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.70 of 5 – based on 16 votes